1) 民用 = Non-Government or non-military, maybe some research company, etc.
2) 中国能到附近来放那么大的气球 - the balloon was released from China, not released from where close to American and Japanese did this in WWII and so easy doing it now.
voiceofme 发表评论于
中国应该进一步说明,气球是中国哪个科研单位放出来的?
Liantao 发表评论于
新闻标题:中国外交部:无人飞艇因不可抗力误入美领空
2023-02-03 07:12:23 by 只影向谁去
Pentagon officials said they did not believe the balloon had surveillance or intelligence-gathering capabilities above and beyond Chinese spy satellites in low earth orbit, In the past, the US has simply allowed balloons like this to waft away, without taking any action or publicizing their presence over the US, the sources said. It is also not the first time a surveillance balloon has appeared over the United States. The US official said there were similar incidents with suspected Chinese surveillance balloons over Hawaii and Guam in recent years.
---------------------------
以上是从CNN上节选的,足以让所有反中的人们的辩解成为笑话。第一,第一,美国军方不认为这些气球有高端侦察设备,不像中国的低轨道卫星;第二,这种气球曾经在美国出现多次,而美国以前都是简单的直接让这些气球飘过。第三,中国的气球曾经不止一次从美国领土飘过,如夏威夷和关岛。(只不过因为现在中美关系紧张,才被爆出来)
Pentagon officials said they did not believe the balloon had surveillance or intelligence-gathering capabilities above and beyond Chinese spy satellites in low earth orbit, In the past, the US has simply allowed balloons like this to waft away, without taking any action or publicizing their presence over the US, the sources said. It is also not the first time a surveillance balloon has appeared over the United States. The US official said there were similar incidents with suspected Chinese surveillance balloons over Hawaii and Guam in recent years.
---------------------------
以上是从CNN上节选的,足以让所有反中的人们的辩解成为笑话。第一,第一,美国军方不认为这些气球有高端侦察设备,不像中国的低轨道卫星;第二,这种气球曾经在美国出现多次,而美国以前都是简单的直接让这些气球飘过。第三,中国的气球曾经不止一次从美国领土飘过,如夏威夷和关岛。(只不过因为现在中美关系紧张,才被爆出来)